Demo ยท Analytics

Deep Dive Analysis๐Ÿ‘‘

Understand where you are, why, and how to improve.

Where You Stand

Actual Units
Units sold in this demo month.
12
Marcus Delgado
Expected Units
Projected units based on lead mix and conversion quality.
11.4
Demo model
Rank
Relative team rank in the demo team context.
#1
out of 5 reps
Performance Index
Your performance relative to the top performer.
100%
vs top performer
How This Works

Derived from: The demo forecast model's current actuals, expected units, rank, and performance index for the selected persona.

Used for: Giving a fast read on present standing before the user digs into why the forecast looks the way it does.

Why You're Here

Performance Analytics

High ConfidenceRank #1
๐Ÿ†
12
Your actual sales results for this period.
Actual Units
11.40
Algorithmic prediction based on your lead sources and behavior patterns compared to store baseline.
Expected Units
+0.60
Difference between actual and expected performance. Positive means you're exceeding predictions, negative means underperforming expectations.
Variance
0.94
Composite score: 60% actual results + 40% process quality (expected units). Rewards both outcomes and good fundamentals.
Balanced Score

Performance Insights

You're outperforming expectations by 0.60 units
Performance Index: 100.0% relative to top performer
Confidence Level: 84.0% based on sample size
Advanced Analytics Unlocked โ€” See leader insights below

๐Ÿ† Top Performer Status

12 units
68.0%
Contact Rate
29.0%
Appointment Rate
79.0%
Show Rate
42.0%
Close Rate

Defense Target

Maintain at least 12 units next month to defend your position.

Focus on process optimization and helping teammates to strengthen overall team performance.

How This Works

Derived from: Forecast funnel rates, lead mix, and activity-based recommendations calculated from the same analytics dataset.

Used for: Explaining what behaviors are helping or hurting performance and what action would most improve the month.

What's Forecasted

Monte Carlo Forecast

High confidence
82%
Quota
Expected Sales11.4 units
Quota Target12 units
Sold So Far12 units
P10 (pessimistic)Likely RangeP90 (optimistic)
9.5Expected: 11.4 ย |ย Quota: 1213.7

Experience Profile

Experienced
Experience Score78%
462
Days Active
384
Total Leads
96
Total Sold

Highest-Impact Coaching Insight

Improving your Close Rate raises your quota probability from 82% to 91%

Probability gain:+9ppยทProjected sales under this scenario: 12.6 units
Current: 82%With improvement: 91%
How This Works

Derived from: Monte Carlo-style expected sales ranges, quota probability, experience scoring, and simulated coaching deltas from the demo analytics model.

Used for: Showing not just a point estimate, but confidence, upside/downside range, and the impact of better execution.

Your Skills by Source

Skill Breakdown

Your conversion rates vs. store baseline. Tap a stage to see source breakdown.

How This Works

Derived from: Posterior conversion estimates by source and funnel stage compared against baseline priors.

Used for: Helping users see where they outperform the store norm and where coaching or process fixes are likely needed.

Activity Breakdown

Activity Breakdown

119 activities across 47 leads this month โ€” each type feeds the Bayesian pipeline at the stage shown.

Phone
Phone Callโ†’ Contact
68(57%)
Connected36No Answer18Left VM14
Messaging
Emailโ†’ Follow-up Touch
11(9%)
Follow-up11
Text / SMSโ†’ Follow-up Touch
8(7%)
Follow-up8
In-Person
Appointmentโ†’ Appointment Set
26(22%)
Appt Set13Showed9Sold4
Test Driveโ†’ Appointment Showed
6(5%)
Showed6
36
Live Contacts
13
Appts Set
15
Showed / Test Drives
14
Voicemails Left
How This Works

Derived from: The rep's demo activity history grouped by action type and outcome.

Used for: Connecting forecast quality back to the underlying operating behavior that created it.

Advanced Analytics

Demo access is limited to top 2 reps.

๐Ÿ† Leader AnalyticsUNLOCKED

Advanced insights for top performers (Confidence: 84.0%)

12
Defense Target

Lead Source Optimization

showroom
12 leads ร— 0.260 weight = 3.1 units
Score: 0.31
High potential
phone
9 leads ร— 0.180 weight = 1.6 units
Score: 0.21
High potential
internet
26 leads ร— 0.120 weight = 3.1 units
Score: 0.15
High potential
Recommendations
Focus on showroom โ€” highest ROI potential
Consider reducing low-weight sources below 0.1 efficiency
Advanced Analytics EnabledConfidence: 84.0%
How This Works

Derived from: Relative advantage logic based on the selected persona's forecast versus the top performer threshold.

Used for: Demonstrating how premium analytics access or unlock states can be explained to reps and managers.

Team Performance Leaderboard

Demo ranking by units sold, with expected units and performance index.
1
Marcus Delgado (You)
PI: 100%
12 units
Exp: 11.4
2
Priya Nair
PI: 83%
10 units
Exp: 9.8
3
Tyler Weston
PI: 75%
9 units
Exp: 8.9
4
Camille Okafor
PI: 50%
6 units
Exp: 7.1
5
Darius Frost
PI: 42%
5 units
Exp: 6.3
How This Works

Derived from: Team context rows combining actual units, expected units, and normalized performance index for each demo rep.

Used for: Giving reps and managers a comparative benchmark so the forecast can be read in competitive context, not isolation.